Tuesday, October 16, 2012

Integration Vs. Synthesis: From Singular quest to Multidisciplinarity!



Remembering VERSATILE Tapas Majumdar: A Colloquium on Discourses across Boundaries (JNU, 15 October 2012)

 When a child enters a school, the world for it is homogeneous in a sense that is not compartmentalized in the boundaries of knowledge. School, college and university education makes us think in the direction of dividing the attributes of particular event, object or phenomenon in respective academic or knowledge disciplines. All problems are necessarily multidisciplinary. We cannot run away from the fact that all things happening in our lives have been by default been described by nature through its diverse/multifaceted/versatile characters which we try to decipher through our limitations-- of knowledge, method of inquiry and frame of observation.

Aim of any knowledge system is not only expose/investigate/treat facts thus to arrive at a qualitative/quantitative interpretation but also to simulate different versions of truths. This requires convergence of different frames of inquiry drawn from different disciplinary boundaries. We know the traditional Hegelian approach of Synthesis in which there is confluence of thesis, antithesis leading towards synthesis.
  • The thesis is an intellectual proposition.
  • The antithesis is simply the negation of the thesis, a reaction to the proposition.
  • The synthesis solves the conflict between the thesis and antithesis by reconciling their common truths, and forming a new proposition.
But convergence of methodologies or cognitive paradigms which govern the holistic understanding of the problem is not merely the objective of interdisciplinary or multidisciplinary education or research. Objective is to cross boundaries in such a way that there are some possibilities of amalgamation of not only different set of perspectives emerging out of different knowledges but also amalgamation of research orientations derived from multiple knowledges, methods and ways of inquiry. Slowly we realize that disciplinary boundaries disappear with the ongoing quest of knowledge.

In Indian context, university model developed and build over the years is largely oriented towards training and nurturing human capital through different disciplines of humanities, social sciences, engineering, medicine, sciences, mathematics, traditional knowledge etc. It would not be a ambitious overstatement to say that our education system to a large extent and research system to a lesser extent has not evolved keeping in mind; addressing the problems. Considering schools, colleges and universities are being one of the most democratic institutions in modern India, this issue needs to be addressed with more urgency and rigor.

Great discoveries are inspired by junctions of openness. Ideas come through open interaction, debate and introspection. The formal system of education is not structured to achieve this. Even the so called ‘interdisciplinary approaches’ also rely on merely combining and organizing different disciplinary perspectives for the sake of lip service. Having understood that for serious research efforts, one needs to be firmly grounded in some discipline/discipline, merely this groundedness sometimes comes in the way of honestly committing towards leaving the boundaries of one's fortress of knowledge and move towards learning new tools/methods/techniques from other field of inquiry.

Interdisciplinary or multidisciplinary approach comes through emphasis on reason. Whenever there is vacuum in society in a sense that faculties of reason are demolished then one faces with problems of fundamentalism, ignorance, obscurantism and faith which compel elements of our society to fight with each other without appreciating the bigger problems of the day like development, education, health, nutrition, employment, livelihood, communal harmony, regional disparity etc.

Essence of scientific imagination is to transcend the limit of boundaries. Disappearing of boundaries of inquiry should happen with some human concern. The problem oriented approach comes handy when thinking about the ways to do this. Human mind is evolved to think both implicitly and explicitly. We think in terms of social, psychological, biological conceptions of life. Thus capacity of human mind is certainly enhanced by other faculties of science, technology, new kind of communication tools developed, new depths acquired in different field of knowledge. Primarily language is our prime asset to understand and exchange all the knowledge. But it is the cognitive faculties of our mind that determines the possibilities of greater in-depth participation in informal/natural/symbiotic/organic interdisciplinary thinking.

Let us summarize why interdisciplinary/multidisciplinary research is of paramount importance and how it can change following situations.
a) Already well established dominance of formalism and positivist approaches in research needs to be altered/reshaped to imbibe convergence of different ways of inquiry shaped by qualitative investigation.
b) Poor state of primary, secondary and tertiary education
c) Mood of the times: Local, isolated and dispersed reasons for having interdisciplinarity
d) Higher education basically driven by single discipline driven agenda

In short, disciplinary boundaries need not limit our thinking. We have to appreciate inevitability of otherness. Mind is both enabler and enabling. If we deploy our mind in the direction of problem solving, then it always engages itself into free, random thinking about ways to solve the problems without carrying the baggage of from where the information, knowledge is coming from. It only searches for tools to solve the problems. Tools available in our life are products of cumulative application of different set of incrementally accumulated skill sets of knowledges. India is a rich legacy and history which talks about interdisciplinary inquiry. People like Surjo Kumar Chakravarty, Ravindranath Tagore, Vinay Sarkar, P.C. Ray, D.P.Mukherjee have shown us the way in this direction. 

Thus, principle challenge in front of us is to move from being A Researcher to that of A Proactive investigator of Human Concern. We have to move from Research Question to Problem Projection and continue this vice-versa journey untill the problems gets sufficient treatment.

-------------------------------------------------------------------